Corrigendum to 'Insights Into Green Synthesized and Chemical Synthesized Nanoparticles for Biomedical and Animal Health Applications'

Abstract

Nanotechnology has gained considerable attention due to its ability to modify the chemical, physical, and optical properties of metals through nanoscale engineering. Consequently, substantial efforts have been directed toward developing novel approaches that employ biological sources for the synthesis of nanoparticles with controlled sizes and compositions. Many conventional synthesis methods are costly, environmentally hazardous, and inefficient in terms of material and energy consumption. The properties of nanoparticles are influenced by several factors, including time, temperature, pH, and ambient conditions. Eco-friendly nanoparticles also demonstrate significant potential in agriculture and animal sciences, where they contribute to environmental protection, improved productivity, and enhanced animal health. Comprehensive characterization of synthesized nanoparticles is essential, particularly for their applications in drug delivery, biomedicine, and veterinary sciences. Green-synthesized nanoparticles offer advantages in biocompatibility and sustainability, whereas chemically synthesized nanoparticles provide greater control over particle properties and functional versatility. The selection of an appropriate synthesis approach depends on application-specific requirements, economic considerations, and sustainability goals. This review primarily focuses on green and chemical synthesis methods, their economic implications, and applications in biomedicine, veterinary, and animal science–related fields.

[Corrigendum: The authors regret that some references (reference 1 and reference 7) in the original article were not directly related to the topic discussed. These references have now been corrected and updated in the reference list. Additionally, a new section has been added to better align the article with the scope of the journal, which was previously overlooked during the editorial process. These corrections do not affect the results, discussion, or conclusions of the article. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused to the readers.]