Combined Application of Biochar and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhances Soil Fertility, Antioxidant Defense, and Growth Performance of Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56946/jspae.v5i2.871Keywords:
Cacao, organic, amendment, soil, enzyme, metabolities, performanceAbstract
Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) productivity in tropical agroecosystems is constrained by declining soil fertility, nutrient limitations, and increasing environmental stress driven by climate variability. Sustainable soil management strategies that enhance soil quality and plant resilience are therefore essential for stable cocoa production. This study evaluated the effects of biochar (40 t ha-1) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; 10 g plant-1), applied individually and in combination, on soil physicochemical properties, enzymatic activities, antioxidant responses, and field performance of young cocoa plants. The experimental soil was slightly acidic and nutrient-deficient with low organic matter content. Both sole and combined applications of biochar and AMF significantly improved soil chemical properties and plant growth compared with the control. Soil respiration was influenced by amendments, with basal respiration following the order Control > AMF > Biochar + AMF > Biochar, while substrate-induced respiration showed no significant treatment effects. Soil phosphatase activities (acid and alkaline phosphatase) were significantly enhanced by amendments, with the highest activities observed under the combined biochar + AMF treatment, indicating improved phosphorus cycling and nutrient availability. Biochar and AMF also altered plant biochemical and antioxidant responses. Biochar alone induced higher proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD and GPx), suggesting a stress-priming effect. In contrast, the combined treatment enhanced photosynthetic pigments, soluble sugars, non-structural carbohydrates, and antioxidant enzymes (CAT, SOD, and GPx), indicating improved physiological performance and metabolic balance. Seasonal variation significantly influenced plant metabolism, with the dry season promoting accumulation of osmoprotectants and stronger antioxidant defense, while the rainy season increased chlorophyll, carotenoids, and phenolic content. Overall, the integrated application of biochar and AMF improved soil fertility, enhanced enzymatic and antioxidant functions, and promoted cocoa growth under field conditions. These findings demonstrate that biochar–AMF synergism is a promising climate-smart strategy for improving soil functionality and sustaining cocoa production in tropical agroecosystems.
References
1. Abbott, P., Benjamin, T., Burniske, G., Croft, M., Fadlalla, M., Fonsah, G., et al. (2018). An analysis of the supply and demand of cocoa in the world market. Purdue University.
2. FAO Stat. (2022). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome. Database. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
3. Arvelo, M. A., González, D., Maroto, S., & Flores, C. (2017). Estructura, dinámica y productividad de sistemas agroforestales de cacao en Venezuela. Revista Forestal Venezolana, 61(1), 27-38.
4. Garcia, G., Gutiérrez-Montes, G.A., Salazar J.C. et al. (2025). Contribution of local knowledge in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) to the well-being of cocoa families in Colombia: a response from the relationship. Agriculture and Human Values, 42, 461-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10623-x
5. Díaz-Montenegro, D. H., Varela, E., & Gil, J. M. (2018). Livelihood strategies of cacao producers in Ecuador: Effects of land ownership and land tenure. Cocoa, 1, 1-16.
6. International Cocoa Organization (ICCO). (2022). Assessment of the movements of global supply and demand. ICCO Quarterly Bulletin of Cocoa Statistics, 48(4).
7. Nieves-Orduña, H. E., Müller, M., Kruse, J., & Röll, A. (2023). Global cocoa production: A review of the main producing countries and the role of smallholders. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43, 45.
8. Kerimi, A. & Williamson, G. (2015). The cardiovascular benefits of dark chocolate. Vascular Pharmacology, 71, 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2015.05.011
9. Opeke, L.K. (2006). Tropical commodity crops. Spectrum Books Ltd. Ibadan, Nigeria. 213pp.
10. Zuidema, P.A., Leffelaar, P.A., Gerritsma, W., Mommer, L., & Anten, N.P.R. (2005). A physiological production model for cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.): Model presentation, validation and application. Agricultural Systems, 84, 195-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2004.06.015
11. Adeleke, T., Agele, S., Fadare, O. (2026). Pruning and fertilizer effects on soil properties, growth and yield of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) trees from moribund field. Journal of Plantation Crops (In Press).
12. Charles, E.F., Agele, S.O., Famuwagun, I.B. & Aiyelari, O.P. (2021). Effects of dry season irrigation and shade on water use, canopy characteristics and yield of cacao in a rainforest zone of Nigeria. Journal of Ecology & Environment Management. ISSN: 2006-9847.
13. Agele, S., Ibiremo, O. & Oladitan, T. (2024). Perspective Chapter: Microclimate, Plant Stress and Extension of Cacao Frontiers to Marginal Agroecologies of the Rainforest Tropics. In: Agele & Ibiremo (Eds.). Shifting Frontiers of Theobroma cacao - Opportunities and Challenges for Production. Intech Open.
14. Famuwagun, I.B., Agele, S., & Aiyelari, P. (2017). Shade effects on growth and development of cacao following 2 years of continuous dry season irrigation. International Journal of Fruit Science, 18(7), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2017.1416326
15. Adekiya, A.O., Agbede, T.M., Olayanju, A. & Ejue, W.S. (2020). Effect of Biochar on Soil Properties, Soil Loss, and Cocoyam Yield on a Tropical Sandy Loam Alfisol. The Scientific World Journal, Article Id: 9391630, 9pp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9391630
16. Oni, B.A., Oziegbe, O. & Olawole, O.O. (2020). Significance of biochar application to the environment and economy. Annals of Agricultural Science, 64(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2019.12.006
17. Frimpong, K.A., Owusu, S., Darko, R.O. et al. (2025). Effect of biochar application rates on soil properties and growth of Amaranthus caudatus. Discover Agriculture, 3, 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00172-0
18. Li, C., Ahmed, W., Li, D., Yu, L., Xu, L., Xu, T., et al. (2022). Biochar suppresses bacterial wilt disease of flue-cured tobacco by improving soil health and functional diversity of rhizosphere microorganisms. Applied Soil Ecology, 171, 104314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104314
19. Wang, Y., Gu, J. & Ni, J.J. (2023). Influence of biochar on soil air permeability and greenhouse gas emissions in vegetated soil: A review. Biogeotechnics, Article 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100040
20. Yang, Y., Ahmed, W., Ye, C., Yang, L., Wu, L., Dai, Z., et al. (2024). Exploring the effect of different application rates of biochar on the accumulation of nutrients and growth of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1225031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1225031
21. Zhang, L., Zhou, J., George, T.S., Limpens, E., Feng, G. (2022). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi conducting the hyphosphere bacterial orchestra. Trends in Plant Science, 27, 402-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.008
22. Ye, Q., Wang, H., & Li, H. (2022). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improve Growth, Photosynthetic Activity, and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Ecolly under Drought Stress. Agronomy, 12, 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12071563
23. Jabborova, D., Wirth, S., Halwani, M., Ibrahim, M.F., Azab, I.H., El-Mogy, M.M., et al. (2021). Growth response of ginger (Zingiber officinale), its physiological properties and soil enzyme activities after biochar application under greenhouse conditions. Horticulturae, 7, 250.
24. Fallah, M., Hadi, H., Amirnia, R., Ghorttapeh, A. H., Ali, T. K. Z., and Sayyed, R. Z. (2021). Eco-Friendly Soil Amendments Improve Growth, Antioxidant Activities, and Root Colonization in Lingrain (Linum Usitatissimum L.) Under Drought Condition. PLoS One, 16, e0261225. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261225
25.Najafi, S., Nasi, H. N., Tuncturk, R., Tuncturk, M., Sayyed, R.Z., and Amirnia, R. (2021). Biofertilizer application enhances drought stress tolerance and alters the antioxidant enzymes in medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo convar. pepo var. Styriaca). Horticulturae, 7, 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120588
26. Fujita, M. & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2022). Approaches to Enhancing Antioxidant Defense in Plants. Antioxidants, 11, 925. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050925
27. Ogunwole, A.A., Agele, S.O. & Adejoro, S.A. (2023). Drought Stress Modulation by Biochar and Effects on Soil and Performance of Seedlings of Urban Forest Tree Species. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35(18), 282-301. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183292
28. Anee, T.I., Nahar, K., Rahman, A., Mahmud, J.A., Bhuiyan, T.F. et al. (2019). Oxidative damage and antioxidant defense in Sesamum indicum after different waterlogging durations. Plants, 8(7), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8070196
29. Chaki, M., Begara-Morales, J.C., Barroso, J.B. (2020). Oxidative stress in plants. Antioxidants, 9, 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060481
30. Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M.H., Zulfiqar, F., Raza, A., Mohsin, S.M., Mahmud, J.A., Fujita, M. & Fotopoulos, V. (2020). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants, 9, 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681
31. Mehla, N., Sindhi, V., Josula, D., Bisht, P. & Wani, S.H. (2017). An introduction to antioxidants and their roles in plant stress tolerance. In: Khan, M.I.R., Khan, N.A., Eds. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Systems in Plants: Role and Regulation under Abiotic Stress. Springer, Singapore. pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5254-5_1
32. Dumanović, J., Nepovimova, E., Natić, M., Kuča, K. & Jaćević, V. (2021). The significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense system in plants: A concise overview. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 552969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.552969
33. Walkley, A., Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter. Soil Science, 37, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
34. Brenner, J.M. (1960). Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. Journal of Agricultural Science, 55, 11-33.
35. Bray, R.H., Kurtz, L.T. (1945). Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, 59, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
36. Stotzky, G. (1965). Microbial respiration. In: Norman, A.G. (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Agronomy Monographs. American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.c62
37. Tabatabai, M.A. (1994). Soil enzymes. In: Methods of soil analysis. SSSA Book Series No. 5. Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.2.c37
38.Lichtenthaler, H.K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology, 148, 350-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
39. Wellburn, A.R. (1994). The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144, 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2
40. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., Teare, I.D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39, 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
41. Schmedes, A., Hølmer, G. (1989). A new thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method for determining free malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydroperoxides selectively as a measure of lipid peroxidation. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 66, 813-817. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653674
42. Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, M.A., Fujita, M. (2011). Nitric oxide modulates antioxidant defense and the methylglyoxal detoxification system and reduces salinity-induced damage of wheat seedlings. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(11), 1203-1215.
43. El-Shabrawi, H., Kumar, B., Kaul, T., Reddy, M.K., Singla-Pareek, S.L., Sopory, S.K. (2010). Redox homeostasis, antioxidant defense, and methylglyoxal detoxification as markers for salt tolerance in rice. Protoplasma, 245, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-010-0144-6
44. Nahar, K., Hasanuzzaman, M., Alam, M.M., Rahman, A., Suzuki, T., Fujita, M. (2016). Polyamine and nitric oxide crosstalk against cadmium toxicity in mung bean. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 126, 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.12.026
45. Yemm, E.W., Willis, A.J. (1954). The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochemical Journal, 57, 508-514. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570508
46. Wen, Y., Wu, R., Qi, D., Xu, T., Chang, W., Li, K., Fang, X., Song, F. (2024). The effect of AMF combined with biochar on plant growth and soil quality under saline-alkali stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 281, 116592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116592
47. Jabborova, D., Annapurna, K., Choudhary, R., Bhowmik, S.N., Desouky, S.E., Selim, S. et al. (2021b). Interactive impact of biochar and AMF on fenugreek root morphology and soil enzymes. Agronomy, 11, 2341. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112341
48. Abbas, A., Naveed, M., Khan, S., Ashraf, M., Siddiqui, M.H., Abbas, N. et al. (2024). The efficacy of organic amendments on maize productivity and soil properties. Spanish Journal of Soil Science, 14, 12814. https://doi.org/10.3389/sjss.2024.12814
49. Rao, M.J., Zheng, B. (2025). The role of polyphenols in abiotic stress tolerance and their antioxidant properties. Antioxidants, 14, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14010074
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
