Role of Soil Fertility in Influencing Nutritional Quality of Indigenous Browse Species in Mixed Crop–Livestock Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56946/jspae.v5i1.860Keywords:
Browse Species, Nutritional Composition, Feed Supplementation, Soil Fertility, Sustainable AgricultureAbstract
Indigenous browse species represent an underutilized feed resource for livestock in tropical systems; however, their nutritional quality and its relationship with soil fertility remain poorly understood, particularly in the Caribbean region. In Guyana, limited information exists on how soil conditions influence the nutritional composition of locally available browse species, constraining their effective utilization in livestock feeding systems. This study evaluated the nutritional quality of eleven indigenous browse species and examined their relationship with soil properties in the Linden area of region 10, Guyana. Leaf samples were analyzed for proximate composition and mineral content, while soil physicochemical characteristics at collection sites were also assessed. Significant interspecific variation (p < 0.001) was observed for all proximate parameters and for sodium and zinc among mineral parameters, while calcium and potassium showed no significant differences among species (p > 0.05). Crude protein ranged from 186,400 mg/kg (18.64%) in Carica papaya to 281,200 mg/kg (28.12%) in Manihot esculenta, while crude fibre varied widely, with the highest values recorded in Pueraria montana. Principal component analysis explained 44.86% of total variance, with the first principal component (PC1) accounting for 26.12%, highlighting clear separation among species based on their nutritional traits. Soils were slightly acidic (pH 5–6) with variable organic matter and nutrient availability, and soil physicochemical properties particularly pH, organic matter content, and cation exchange capacity were found to influence the mineral composition of browse foliage across collection sites. Among the species evaluated, M. esculenta, Gliricidia sepium, and Ipomoea batatas exhibited the highest crude protein concentrations, while Colocasia esculenta recorded the highest mineral content, supporting their potential as supplementary feed resources for livestock. These findings highlight the importance of soil–plant interactions in determining the feed quality of indigenous browse species and support their strategic use as sustainable supplementary feed resources in tropical livestock production systems.
References
1. Oltjen, J. and J. Beckett, Role of ruminant livestock in sustainable agricultural systems. Journal of Animal science, 1996. 74(6): p. 1406-1409. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.7461406x
2. Herrero, M., et al., The roles of livestock in developing countries. animal, 2013. 7(s1): p. 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001954
3. Godber, O.F. and R. Wall, Livestock and food security: vulnerability to population growth and climate change. Global change biology, 2014. 20(10): p. 3092-3102. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12589
4. Godfray, H.C.J., et al., Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. science, 2010. 327(5967): p. 812-818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
5.McDermott, J.J., et al., Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics. Livestock science, 2010. 130(1-3): p. 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.014
6. Komarek, A.M., et al., Income, consumer preferences, and the future of livestock-derived food demand. Global Environmental Change, 2021. 70: p. 102343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102343
7. Balehegn, M., et al., Improving adoption of technologies and interventions for increasing supply of quality livestock feed in low-and middle-income countries. Global food security, 2020. 26: p. 100372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100372
8. Mudau, H.S., et al., Nutrients profile of 52 browse species found in semi-arid areas of South Africa for livestock production: Effect of harvesting site. Plants, 2021. 10(10): p. 2127. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102127
9. Abraham, G., Y. Kechero, and D. Andualem, Nutritional quality of indigenous legume browse in southern Ethiopia: farmers' preference and correlation of local valuation of feed value with scientific indicators. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2023. 10: p. 1198212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1198212
10. Crews, T.E. and M. Peoples, Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2004. 102(3): p. 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.018
11. Duguma, B. and G.P. Janssens, Assessment of livestock feed resources and coping strategies with dry season feed scarcity in mixed crop-livestock farming systems around the gilgel gibe catchment, Southwest Ethiopia. Sustainability, 2021. 13(19): p. 10713. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910713
12. Mattila, P.H., et al., Contents of phytochemicals and antinutritional factors in commercial protein-rich plant products. Food Quality and Safety, 2018. 2(4): p. 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyy021
13. Koura, B.I., M. Shipandeni, and M.I. Cutrignelli, Sustainable Feeds for Animal Nutrition in Tropical Areas. 2023, MDPI. p. 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081379
14. Vastolo, A., et al., Alternative and novel livestock feed: Reducing environmental impact. 2024, Frontiers Media SA. p. 1441905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1441905
15. Li, Z., et al., An Evaluation of Soybean Protein Concentrate as a Replacement for Fish Meal with Methionine Supplementation in Diets for Hybrid Sturgeon (Acipenser baerii♀× A. schrenckii♂). Animals, 2025. 15(6): p. 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15060787
16. Peel, M.C., B.L. Finlayson, and T.A. McMahon, Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and earth system sciences, 2007. 11(5): p. 1633-1644. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
17. Wang, Z., R.L. Wilby, and D. Yu, Forecasting global rainfall in a changing climate: a machine learning approach using Köppen-Geiger zones. Earth Systems and Environment, 2025: p. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00876-9
18. Jameson, K.P., An annotated bibliography of agricultural development in Guyana. 1977: Development Studies Program, US Agency for International Development. https://doi.org/10.2172/6634248
19. Hammond, D.S., Tropical Forests of the Guiana Shield: Ancient Forests in a Modern World. 2005: CABI Pub. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995366.0000
20. Carter, M.R. and E.G. Gregorich, Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2007: CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005271
21. Tan, K.H., Soil sampling, preparation, and analysis. 2005: CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482274769
22. Liebig, M.A., et al., Sampling Considerations and Field Evaluations for Soil Health Assessment. Soil Health Series: Volume 2 Laboratory Methods for Soil Health Analysis, 2021: p. 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780891189831.ch2
23. Okalebo, J.R., K.W. Gathua, and P.L. Woomer, Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: a working manual second edition. Sacred Africa, Nairobi, 2002. 21: p. 25-26.
24. Quinn, G.P. and M.J. Keough, Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. 2002: Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806384
25. Krebs, C.J., et al., Long-term monitoring in the boreal forest reveals high spatio-temporal variability among primary ecosystem constituents. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2023. 11: p. 1187222.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1187222
26. Wagner, M.R. and M. Kleiner, How thoughtful experimental design can empower biologists in the omics era. Nature Communications, 2025. 16(1): p. 7263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62616-x
27. Vilas, D., et al., Optimized stratified random surveys best estimate multispecies abundance in a rapidly changing ecosystem. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2025. 82(6): p. fsae158. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae158
28. Zhang, J., et al., Response of leaf functional traits to soil nutrients in the wet and dry seasons in a subtropical forest on an island. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023. 14: p. 1236607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1236607
29. Denny, E.G., et al., Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications. International journal of Biometeorology, 2014. 58(4): p. 591-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0789-5
30. Niinemets, Ü., T.F. Keenan, and L. Hallik, A worldwide analysis of within‐canopy variations in leaf structural, chemical and physiological traits across plant functional types. New Phytologist, 2015. 205(3): p. 973-993.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13096
31. Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J., et al., Canopy functional trait variation across Earth's tropical forests. Nature, 2025. 641(8061): p. 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08663-2
32. Aletor, V. and O. Adeogun, Nutrient and anti-nutrient components of some tropical leafy vegetables. Food chemistry, 1995. 53(4): p. 375-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)99830-S
33. Samtiya, M., R.E. Aluko, and T. Dhewa, Plant food anti-nutritional factors and their reduction strategies: an overview. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition, 2020. 2(1): p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-020-0020-5
34. Onyeike, E.N. and T.T. Omubo-Dede, Effect of heat treatment on the proximate composition, energy values, and levels of some toxicants in African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) seed varieties. Plant foods for human nutrition, 2002. 57(3): p. 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021833516234
35. Shanthakumari, S., V. Mohan, and J. de Britto, Nutritional evaluation and elimination of toxic principles in wild yam (Dioscorea spp.). Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 2008. 8(3): p. 319-325.
36. OAC, A., Official Methods of Analysis. 15-th Edition. Association of official Chemists, Washington, USA, 1990.
37. Association, N.F.T., Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association, Omaha, 1993.
38. Lindsay, W.L. and W. Norvell, Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil science society of America journal, 1978. 42(3): p. 421-428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
39. Rathore, A., et al., Assessment of soil fertility status and spatial variability at farm level using geostatistical tools. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 2025. 10(4): p. 619864. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab.104.4
40. Gee, G.W. and D. Or, 2.4 Particle‐size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: Part 4 physical methods, 2002. 5: p. 255-293. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c12
41. Blake, G.R. and K. Hartge, Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods, 1986. 5: p. 363-375. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c13
42. Thomas, G.W., Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of soil analysis: part 3 chemical methods, 1996. 5: p. 475-490. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16
43. Rhoades, J., Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 1996. 5: p. 417-435. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c14
44. Walkley, A. and I.A. Black, An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science, 1934. 37(1): p. 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
45. Bremner, J., Total nitrogen. Methods of soil analysis: part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 1965. 9: p. 1149-1178. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.c32
46. Noor, F., et al., Effect of foliar application of potassium on wheat tolerance to salt stress. PLoS One, 2025. 20(11): p. e0336407. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336407
47. Olsen, S.R., Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. 1954: US Department of Agriculture.
48. Bray, R.H. and L.T. Kurtz, Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil science, 1945. 59(1): p. 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
49. Chapman, H.D. and P.F. Pratt, Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Soil Science, 1962. 93(1): p. 68. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196201000-00015
50. El-Goud, A. and K. Amal, Integrated Nutrient Management by used Vermicompost, Chicken Manure and Bokashi EM1 with Vermitea or Seaweed on Green Onion Growth and Yield. Journal of Plant Production, 2025. 16(9): p. 491-498. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2025.403895.1488
51. Kumari, R., et al., Soil conditioner improves soil fertility, nutrient uptake, and productivity in maize-potato system. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2025: p. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2025.2564926
52. Team, R.C., R: A language and environment for statistical Computing (4.4. 3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2025.
53. Wickham, H., Data analysis, in ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2016, Springer. p. 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
54. Hamner, B., Frasco, M., & LeDell, E. (2018). Metrics: Evaluation metrics for machine Hope RM. Rmisc: Ryan Miscellaneous. 2013. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rmisc/index.html
55. Wei, T., Simko, V., Levy, M., Xie, Y., Jin, Y., & Zemla, J. (2017). Package ‘corrplot’. Statistician, 56(316), e24.
56. Cook, B.G., et al., Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool. 2005.
57. Dahlanuddin, O.Y., et al., Feed intake, rumen fermentation, digestibility and live weight gain of male Bali cattle (Bos javanicus) fed different mixtures of Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2019. 31.
58. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
59. National Research Council, Committee on Animal Nutrition, & Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition. (2001). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: 2001. National Academies Press
60. Sun, H., et al., Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) leaves as nutritional and functional foods. Food chemistry, 2014. 156: p. 380-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.079
61. Van An, L., Sweet potato leaves for growing pigs: Biomass yield, digestion and nutritive value. 2004.
62. Gulizia, J., K. Downs, and S. Cui, Kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata) age variability effects on total and nutrient-specific in situ rumen degradation. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2019. 47(1): p. 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1652615
63. Gulizia, J.P. and K.M. Downs, Comparison of dietary kudzu leaf meal (Pueraria montana Var. lobata) and alfalfa meal supplementation effect on broiler (Gallus gallus domesticus) performance, carcass characteristics, and organ parameters. Animals, 2020. 10(1): p. 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010147
64. Serrapica, F., et al., Alternative and Novel Livestock Feed: Reducing Environmental Impact. 2024: Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-8325-5235-3
65. Stypinski, J., et al., Effect of acid detergent lignin concentration for diets formulated to be similar in neutral detergent fiber content on energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2024. 107(8): p. 5699-5708. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-24318
66. Weiss, W. and N. St-Pierre, Perspective and Commentary: Variation in nutrient composition of feeds and diets and how it can affect formulation of dairy cow diets. Applied Animal Science, 2024. 40(5): p. 608-618. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2024-02578
67. Glass, D. and S. Al-Hamdani, Kudzu forage quality evaluation as an animal feed source. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2016.74063
68. Korir, D., et al., Effects of replacing Brachiaria hay with either Desmodium intortum or dairy concentrate on animal performance and enteric methane emissions of low-yielding dairy cows. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2022. 3: p. 963323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.963323
69. Zubair, M.W., et al., Functional profile and encapsulating properties of Colocasia esculenta (Taro). Food Science & Nutrition, 2023. 11(6): p. 2440-2449. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3357
70. Hou, X.-X., et al., Effects of Inoculation with Different Rhizobia on the Nutritional Value and Ruminal Fermentation of Desmodium intortum. Fermentation, 2023. 9(4): p. 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9040316
71. Ponnampalam, E.N., et al., Sustainable livestock production by utilising forages, supplements, and agricultural by-products: Enhancing productivity, muscle gain, and meat quality-A review. Meat Science, 2025: p. 109921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109921
72. Lyons, G., et al., Macro-and micronutrients from traditional food plants could improve nutrition and reduce non-communicable diseases of islanders on atolls in the South Pacific. Plants, 2020. 9(8): p. 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9080942
73. Burkart, S., S. Mwendia, and P. Karimi, Transforming livestock through forages: Opportunities, barriers, and strategic priorities in sub‐Saharan Africa. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 2026. 12(1): p. e70110. https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70110
74. Rengel, Z., Availability of Mn, Zn and Fe in the rhizosphere. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2015. 15(2): p. 397-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162015005000036
75. Rao, I.M., et al., Root adaptations to soils with low fertility and aluminium toxicity. Annals of Botany, 2016. 118(4): p. 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw073
76. Niu, K., et al., Tradeoffs between forage quality and soil fertility: Lessons from Himalayan rangelands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016. 234: p. 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.04.023
Bolan, N., A critical review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant and soil, 1991. 134(2): p. 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012037
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
